Connect with us

MLB

Bryce Harper of Washington Nationals avoids free agency talk

Published

on

WASHINGTON — Bryce Harper didn’t walk out the door. But he didn’t walk into a trap, either.

“I’m a National now,” Harper said Tuesday, when asked about his future prior to Washington‘s series opener against the visiting New York Yankees. “We’re going into the series trying to win some ballgames. That’s the only thing on my mind. Just trying to beat a good team over there.”

Harper’s goal went unrealized Tuesday, as the game was suspended by rain with the score tied 3-3 in the middle of the sixth inning. The game is set to resume Wednesday at 5:05 p.m., ahead of the previously scheduled 7:05 p.m. second game of the series.

New York, which came here with the best record in baseball (28-12), has long been considered a potential destination for Harper, whose contract expires after this season. Even though the Yankees acquired 2017 National League MVP Giancarlo Stanton in December, they’re still one of several teams thought to be among the primary contenders for Harper’s services.

Back in February, when Harper addressed reporters for the first time this year, he said that if anyone asked about his status beyond the 2018 season, he’d “be walking out right out the door.” On Tuesday, the former NL MVP stood in front of his locker and danced around several questions pertaining to the Yankees and his future.

“Every single time we go in to face somebody, we’ve got to do things to keep track of what’s important,” said Harper, “and that’s winning ballgames and doing the things we can as a team to play well. Doesn’t matter who we’re playing — if it’s the Yankees, Cubs, Dodgers, Phillies, name it. Doesn’t really matter the team or the atmosphere. Just trying to go in there, try to win ballgames.”

The Nationals have been winning ballgames despite the fact that their star right fielder has been slumping. Although Harper entered Tuesday leading the majors in walks (41) and tied for the lead in home runs (13), he’s hitting just .186 over the past four weeks, dropping his average to .236 on the season.

Washington began its two-game set with New York having won 13 of its past 15 contests to move within 1.5 games of the first-place Atlanta Braves in the NL East. The hot streak has come without contributions from several injured regulars, including second baseman Daniel Murphy and left fielder Adam Eaton.

Eaton, who has been out since injuring his ankle in early April, had arthroscopic surgery on Thursday. He revealed Tuesday that he expects to miss six weeks.

“I’m pumped to get off to rehab and strengthen the crap out of this thing and be back for half the season,” said Washington’s leadoff hitter, who missed most of last season after injuring the same ankle and his knee in late April. “That’s my goal, for sure. Three months of baseball. Give me enough time to get into the grind of things. I’m excited to get back.”

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

MLB

Joe Girardi withdraws from Cincinnati Reds’ manager search

Published

on

Joe Girardi has withdrawn his name from consideration for the Cincinnati Reds‘ managerial vacancy, according to multiple reports.

Girardi reportedly was one of three candidates to be considered for second interviews, along with Brad Ausmus and David Bell.

The Athletic, which first reported Girardi’s withdrawal, reported Friday that he plans to remain with MLB Network for now but still wants to manage.

Girardi, 54, also reportedly has interviewed for the Texas Rangers‘ managerial vacancy.

Girardi, who had a 15-year playing career, is 988-794 in 11 seasons as a major league manager, including 10 seasons with the New York Yankees, whom he guided to a World Series titles in 2009.

He spent last season at MLB Network after being fired by the Yankees following the 2017 season, when he led the Yankees to the American League Championship Series. The Yankees lost to the eventual World Series champion Houston Astros in seven games.

Girardi also managed the Florida Marlins in 2006.

Source link

Continue Reading

MLB

Chris Sale pitching Game 1, probably David Price Game 2 for Boston Red Sox in World Series

Published

on

With five days before the start of the World Series, Boston Red Sox manager Alex Cora has time to line up his pitching rotation.

Cora, speaking Friday on WEEI, confirmed that ace Chris Sale will go in Game 1 at Fenway Park on Tuesday, facing either the Los Angeles Dodgers or Milwaukee Brewers.

The Dodgers lead the National League Championship Series, 3 games to 2, going into Friday night’s Game 6 in Milwaukee.

Cora said he would wait until he knew the opponent before deciding the rest of the rotation. But the manager said that David Price — brilliant in Thursday night’s ALCS-clinching Game 5 against the Houston Astros — would “probably” start Game 2.

Sale has not pitched since Saturday’s Game 1 loss to the Astros in the ALCS. He has been sidelined by a stomach virus that sent him to the hospital on Sunday.

Cora said Sale has been regaining strength since his release Monday from Massachusetts General Hospital, where he spent Sunday night for observation. The club hasn’t specified Sale’s ailment or treatment.

The Red Sox arrived back in Boston on Friday morning and were greeted by an ALCS championship banner that had already been hung at Fenway Park.

Source link

Continue Reading

MLB

The unlucky legacy of the 2018 Houston Astros

Published

on

History will remember these Houston Astros as the ones that got unlucky.

Specifically, it will remember the fly ball Jose Altuve hit over the wall in Game 4, the extraordinary leap Mookie Betts made for it, and the way that after the ball had landed in the stands, uncaught, it was declared an out. It will remember the debate that ensued over what constitutes interference — Joe West’s confident ruling on an essentially unknowable call, the flukily blocked camera that might have otherwise saved Altuve’s home run and the Astros’ season. The future will have no trouble remembering that all as, from Houston’s perspective, bad luck.

Most luck in baseball, though, is not the deus ex machina of Joe West running headlong into a play and flipping it to its opposite. Most luck is incredibly unsatisfying to identify, for both the winning team and the losing team, and because of that we usually refer to it by euphemisms: A team caught a bad break, or a pitcher was fortunate to get away with a pitch. We struggle for the word because we struggle with what we’re actually talking about, which is something embedded in almost every baseball play. It’s this:

Baseball doesn’t give partial credit.

In baseball, the point is to win the World Series and the tactic involved — the skill involved — is “avoiding outs” and “getting outs.” But we don’t declare the World Series winner based on who avoided the most outs (i.e. who got the most hits). That would be one kind of sport — golf is that kind of sport, and the discus throw, and the 1,500 freestyle, where every stroke, inch or second counts equally toward the final outcome — but baseball is the kind that has added layers upon layers of suspense and variety: Outs avoided make rallies; rallies make runs; runs make wins; wins make standings; standings make postseason series; and postseason series make the World Series winner. And, indeed, outs themselves are made up of layers and sequences — strikes and balls, batted balls chased and caught and thrown and tagged. You might even say the point is to win the World Series but the tactics are “throw good strikes” and “hit the ball hard.” The layers in between give it all texture.

That’s why it’s fun. And the result is that, along the way from “control the count” to “win the World Series,” only some hits count. A hit that doesn’t produce a rally is ultimately no better than an out, a rally that doesn’t produce a run is ultimately no better than an out and a run that doesn’t win a game is ultimately no better than an out. We measure skill based on those hits, rallies and runs, but we measure success based only on the higher outcomes.

This is true at virtually every level of play, and it’s almost always what we’re actually talking about when we talk about luck. A team that vastly underperforms its run differential — scored more runs than its opponent in the aggregate, but there is no partial credit for a close loss. A pitcher that has allowed an unsustainably low BABIP — gives up lots of hard contact, but there is no partial credit on a diving catch.

On Thursday, in the third inning, the game scoreless, the series still very much undecided, Justin Verlander got two strikes on J.D. Martinez. He threw a perfect 1-2 slider, right on the outside black, just above the knees. It was a pitch that umpires across baseball call a strike 84 percent of the time, according to ESPN Stats & Info. It was a pitch that, had it been slightly worse — i.e., slightly more hittable — Martinez probably would have swung at, probably would have whiffed at, or hit meekly to the shortstop, or maybe hit for a single. But Martinez took it, umpire Chris Guccione called it a ball, and on the next pitch Verlander threw a hanging curveball — this one, ironically, probably not in the strike zone — and Martinez crushed it for what ultimately would be the game-winning, series-winning home run.

Verlander threw two good strikes, because he’s a great pitcher and that’s the skill. But baseball doesn’t give partial credit for two strikes — only the third “counts.” And then Verlander threw a pitch that is often called strike three. But baseball doesn’t play out all the simulations, but only the one, and so the 84 percent don’t “count.”

This is true of the ball Alex Bregman hit in the bottom of the ninth Wednesday, with two outs and the bases loaded. Statcast says it’s a hit 79 percent of the time. You don’t have to believe that number specifically to agree Bregman went to the plate trying to do something, did something very close to what he was trying to do, and but for a matter of inches would have won an entire baseball game instead of losing an entire baseball game. The luck isn’t whether the diving Andrew Benintendi catches or doesn’t catch it; that’s the sport. The luck is in how we keep score. Bregman gets nothing.


The Astros came into this season playing for legacy. They’d just won a World Series, which is the ultimate goal in sports. But the great teams in history won a couple or a few World Series, and the Astros had a chance to be one of the great teams in history.

If you mean “great” in terms of skill — how well they executed those tactics of avoiding outs and getting outs — they made it. The website Baseball Prospectus publishes what it calls third-order standings, which estimate what each team’s record should be based on their underlying performance of, more or less, avoiding outs and getting outs. The Astros not only had the best third-order record in baseball this year, but they had the eighth-best since 1950, truly elite. They had the best ERA+ in baseball this year and the second-best OPS+. They won 103 games — the fourth-most by any team this century — and the evidence suggests pretty strongly that they actually played even better than that, depending on how you consider the words “played” and “better.”

Then they got run over by the Boston Red Sox in the ALCS. But what do we mean by run over? Outhit? Outpitched? On the most basic, tactical level, the Astros outhit the Red Sox this series: They had the better on-base percentage (by 10 points) and the better slugging percentage (by one point). Which, of course, means they also outpitched the Red Sox, on that level. Their pitchers also threw more strikes than the Red Sox pitchers did. Their pitchers also got more swinging strikes than the Red Sox pitchers did. The Astros are so, so good at baseball, and in five games they showed it.

And they got smoked. A lot of good counts get wiped out by a caught line drive, and a lot of hits get wiped out by the third out of the inning. They don’t count. By what counts, the Astros got smoked. They got outscored, and they lost 80 percent of their games, and the world will never get to really discern whether the Astros actually got unlucky or just came up short when it mattered most — those two explanations, unluckily, looking very similar to each other.

They also arguably ran into the most basic form of bad luck — a good opponent. They didn’t draw the 2014 Orioles in the ALCS, but the 2018 Red Sox, also one of the great teams in history. Benintendi caught that ball. Martinez hit that homer. Betts was in position to make that play. The Red Sox are playing for the World Series, but they’re also good enough to be playing for legacy.

So if you mean “great” by skill, yes, the Astros are probably there with the greatest teams in history. If you mean “great” by outcomes, they’ve still got work to do. Unluckily for the Astros, the former is just something we talk about. The latter is what pretty much all of us — including you, me, and the Astros themselves — actually care about. History will remember these Astros as the ones that got unlucky, and lost.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending